Odds.how

The theory site of The School of Odds.

Kelly criterion simulator

A positive expected value identifies a favorable bet; it does not determine how much of a bankroll can safely be exposed to it. This simulator applies different staking rules to the same opportunities and the same sequences of wins and losses, isolating the consequences of money management.

The comparison is paired: simulated player 1 receives exactly the same opportunities and outcomes under every strategy, as does simulated player 2, and so forth. Only the amount wagered changes.

Start with a lesson:
1. Betting environment
2. Staking strategies
3. Bankroll rules and simulation size

Players that fail remain in every population statistic. Removing them would make the surviving strategies appear safer than they were. Credit is an artificial comparison mode: proportional strategies cannot wager a percentage of a non-positive bankroll.

Every faint line is one persistent simulated player. A path that reaches the bankruptcy boundary remains visible; failed players are not removed.

Interpretation: the simulator illustrates mathematical consequences under stated assumptions. A positive true expected value is imposed by the selected environment; real probability estimates are uncertain, and no staking system can make an incorrect estimate profitable.